Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?)

Andi Kleen ak@muc.de
Mon Dec 13 06:25:00 GMT 1999


law@cygnus.com (Jeffrey A Law) writes:

>   In message < 199912130427.XAA04700@caip.rutgers.edu >you write:
>   >  > From: Jamie Lokier <egcs@tantalophile.demon.co.uk>
>   >  > 
>   >  > Summary: free pdf generators and viewers are around, but they're not
>   >  > particularly good.
>   >  > -- Jamie
>   > 
>   > Great, so back to the topic at hand.  Shall we provide PS and/or PDF
>   > copies of the manual on the web site?  (I say yes.)
>   > 
>   > Given that we are creating HTML copies automatically, it should not be
>   > hard to tie in the other formats using one of these tools.
> I just don't see the benefit.  If people want a ps or pdf version, they
> can get those by building them from the sources.

I guess it is useful for those folks that e.g. install a Linux distribution
with a binary copy of gcc. It usually only ships with info docs. They will
probably never compile gcc from the source, but still want a printed out
manual. Printing from the info pages does not look very good. For those people
a .ps.gz version would be useful. .pdf does not look very useful for me, 
because it is mainly for online browsing, and info does this job fine.


-Andi

-- 
This is like TV. I don't like TV.


More information about the Gcc mailing list