Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?)
Andi Kleen
ak@muc.de
Mon Dec 13 06:25:00 GMT 1999
law@cygnus.com (Jeffrey A Law) writes:
> In message < 199912130427.XAA04700@caip.rutgers.edu >you write:
> > > From: Jamie Lokier <egcs@tantalophile.demon.co.uk>
> > >
> > > Summary: free pdf generators and viewers are around, but they're not
> > > particularly good.
> > > -- Jamie
> >
> > Great, so back to the topic at hand. Shall we provide PS and/or PDF
> > copies of the manual on the web site? (I say yes.)
> >
> > Given that we are creating HTML copies automatically, it should not be
> > hard to tie in the other formats using one of these tools.
> I just don't see the benefit. If people want a ps or pdf version, they
> can get those by building them from the sources.
I guess it is useful for those folks that e.g. install a Linux distribution
with a binary copy of gcc. It usually only ships with info docs. They will
probably never compile gcc from the source, but still want a printed out
manual. Printing from the info pages does not look very good. For those people
a .ps.gz version would be useful. .pdf does not look very useful for me,
because it is mainly for online browsing, and info does this job fine.
-Andi
--
This is like TV. I don't like TV.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list