Results for egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental)

Jeffrey A Law law@cygnus.com
Mon Sep 28 03:19:00 GMT 1998


  In message < m0zNRH0-000395C@ocean.lucon.org >you write:
  > nowhere. The result is everyone wastes time on those bugs which can be
  > caught by libg++. Should that be a check-in requirement?
No.  It should not be a check-in requirement.

If we ever have check-in requirements, they would include either a
bootstrap of the compiler or running the existing testsuite, not
building/testing external code like libg++.

jeff



More information about the Gcc mailing list