Results for egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental)

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message < m0zNRH0-000395C@ocean.lucon.org >you write:
  > nowhere. The result is everyone wastes time on those bugs which can be
  > caught by libg++. Should that be a check-in requirement?
No.  It should not be a check-in requirement.

If we ever have check-in requirements, they would include either a
bootstrap of the compiler or running the existing testsuite, not
building/testing external code like libg++.

jeff