egcs 1.1 error under Linux

[Matthew Newhook]

On Sat, Sep 05, 1998 at 09:36:31AM -0400, Alex Buell wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Sep 1998, Matthew Newhook wrote:
> 
> > For me this depends. When I develop I want fast compiles, and I don't
> > care if the code is particularly slow. If I want fast code then I'll
> > compile with optimization, then I don't care how slow the compiler is.
> 
> I would think that if one is serious about developing, one would use a
> fast development machine for building the project, and testing the project
> on the minimum supported target platform (i.e a slower machine). This is
> how I always try to work. 

I don't care how fast the machine is, compilations still take too damn
long! Unless it's instantaneous then to me (and I'm sure most people)
it took too long ;) So for development purposes, compilers should be
as fast as possible.

> Cheers,
> Alex
> --
>  /\_/\  Legalise cannabis now! 
> ( o.o ) Grow some cannabis today!
>  > ^ <  Peace, Love, Unity and Respect to all.
> 
> http://www.tahallah.demon.co.uk

Matthew
-- 
Matthew Newhook				E-Mail: mailto:matthew@ooc.com
Software Designer			WWW:    http://www.ooc.com
Object Oriented Concepts, Inc.		Phone:  (978) 439 9285 x 246