[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-9030-g78e0cf06c81: 5 regressions 4 improvements on master-thumb_m33_hard_eabi

[Christophe Lyon]

On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 at 17:49, Sam James via Gcc-regression
<gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> ci_notify@linaro.org writes:
>
> > Dear contributor,
> >
> > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below.
> >
> > In  arm-eabi cortex-m33 hard, after:
> >   | commit gcc-15-9030-g78e0cf06c81
> >   | Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
> >   | Date:   Sat Mar 29 21:09:25 2025 +0000
> >   |
> >   |     testsuite: arm: fixup more dg-final syntax
> >   |
> >   |     ... as Richard E mentioned on the ML. Followup to r15-8956-ge90d6c2639c392.
> >   |
> >   |     gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >   | ... 2 lines of the commit log omitted.
> >
> > Produces 5 regressions 4 improvements:
> >   |
> >   | regressions.sum:
> >   | Running gcc:gcc.target/arm/arm.exp ...
> >   | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/short-vfp-1.c scan-assembler-times sxth\\tr[0-9]+,r[0-9]+ 2
> >   | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/short-vfp-1.c scan-assembler-times vcvt\\.f32\\.s32\\ts[0-9]+,s[0-9]+ 2
> >   | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/short-vfp-1.c scan-assembler-times vcvt\\.s32\\.f32\\ts[0-9]+,s[0-9]+ 2
> >   | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/short-vfp-1.c scan-assembler-times vmov\\tr[0-9]+,s[0-9]+ 2
> >   | ... and 1 more
>
> This one may need an ARM person to take a look at. (The issue was
> latent, and the test wasn't being run fully before.)

Indeed. I even re-built the compiler from the commit when the test was
introduced, and it wouldn't pass even after fixing the dg directives
:-(