[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-9030-g78e0cf06c81: 5 regressions 4 improvements on master-thumb_m33_hard_eabi
Sam James
sam@gentoo.org
Sun Mar 30 15:49:01 GMT 2025
ci_notify@linaro.org writes:
> Dear contributor,
>
> Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below.
>
> In arm-eabi cortex-m33 hard, after:
> | commit gcc-15-9030-g78e0cf06c81
> | Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
> | Date: Sat Mar 29 21:09:25 2025 +0000
> |
> | testsuite: arm: fixup more dg-final syntax
> |
> | ... as Richard E mentioned on the ML. Followup to r15-8956-ge90d6c2639c392.
> |
> | gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> | ... 2 lines of the commit log omitted.
>
> Produces 5 regressions 4 improvements:
> |
> | regressions.sum:
> | Running gcc:gcc.target/arm/arm.exp ...
> | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/short-vfp-1.c scan-assembler-times sxth\\tr[0-9]+,r[0-9]+ 2
> | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/short-vfp-1.c scan-assembler-times vcvt\\.f32\\.s32\\ts[0-9]+,s[0-9]+ 2
> | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/short-vfp-1.c scan-assembler-times vcvt\\.s32\\.f32\\ts[0-9]+,s[0-9]+ 2
> | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/short-vfp-1.c scan-assembler-times vmov\\tr[0-9]+,s[0-9]+ 2
> | ... and 1 more
This one may need an ARM person to take a look at. (The issue was
latent, and the test wasn't being run fully before.)
More information about the Gcc-regression
mailing list