14 GCC regressions, 11 new, with your patch on 2003-07-05T14:15:01Z.

[Zack Weinberg]

Geoff Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org> writes:

> "Zack Weinberg" <zack@codesourcery.com> writes:
>> 
>> Either we need to put GNU iconv into the GCC distribution, or all
>> these tests are going to have to be XFAILed on targets that don't have
>> iconv.  Personally I lean towards importing GNU iconv, as this will
>> provide consistent behavior across hosts and let me get rid of some
>> dodgy fallback logic.
...
>
> I'm inclined to agree.  GCC will be simpler if we can always assume
> that iconv is provided, and users will find it easier to build GCC if
> iconv is always included and they don't have to go hunting for it.

Okay.  I will do the work to import libiconv after the current set of
autoconf problems are resolved.

zw