c/7872: ICE on legal code, regression from 3.0 and 2.9*

[Richard Zidlicky]

The following reply was made to PR c/7872; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Richard Zidlicky <rz@linux-m68k.org>
To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
        nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c/7872: ICE on legal code, regression from 3.0 and 2.9*
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 20:38:21 +0100

 On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 03:45:46PM -0000, bangerth@dealii.org wrote:
 > Synopsis: ICE on legal code, regression from 3.0 and 2.9*
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
 > State-Changed-By: bangerth
 > State-Changed-When: Wed Nov 27 07:45:44 2002
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >         Richard, same here: I don't have an m68k so cannot check your problem.
 you can, the bugreport should have enough information to configure the 
 cross-compiler and all the necessary input to test the problem on any
 architecture.
 
 >         What happened to the patch you appended? I does not seem
 >         to have been applied...
 
 Unfortunately untill now I have seen absolutely no response to this 
 bugreport, thanks for looking at it.
 
 Quite possible my solution is not the correct or best one, I noticed
 the problem would also go away if m68k had CLASS_CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE 
 defined. However the gcc docs describe this as something that should 
 affect floating point only so I am not sure about this.
 
 Richard