[PATCH] testsuite: mips: use noinline attribute instead of -fno-inline

[Xi Ruoyao]

On Fri, 2021-07-23 at 04:21 +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jul 2021, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches wrote:
> 
> > > > > > The "smallest fix" is simply adding -fno-inline into
> > > > > > mips.exp. 
> > > > > > However
> > > > > > I don't like it because I agree with you that mips.exp
> > > > > > shouldn't
> > > > > > care
> > > > > > about dg-options, at least don't do it too much.
> > > > > As I said in the other message, I think the smallest fix is the
> > > > > way
> > > > > to
> > > > > go though.
> > > > THanks for chiming in Richard.  I didn't know all the background
> > > > here.   
> > > > Let's just go with the small fix based on your recommendation.  We
> > > > can
> > > > always revisit if we keep running into issues in this code.
> > > 
> > > Pushed at 3b33b113.
> > 
> > It looks like that was the originally posted patch though.  It
> > probably
> > wasn't very clear, but by smallest fix, I meant adding inline to:
> 
>  Xi, will you revert your commit that was not approved and apply the 
> correct fix?

Sorry, somehow I didn't see Richard's reply.  Perhaps a misconfiguration
on my mail server.

The "correct" fix is 

--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/mips/mips.exp
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/mips/mips.exp
@@ -325,6 +325,7 @@ foreach option {
     finite-math-only
     fixed-hi
     fixed-lo
+    inline
     lax-vector-conversions
     omit-frame-pointer
     optimize-sibling-calls

right?  I'll do a regtest and if there is no problem I'll commit it.
-- 
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@mengyan1223.wang>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University