[PATCH] rs6000: Fix misnamed built-in

Bill Schmidt wschmidt@linux.ibm.com
Wed Sep 16 13:26:35 GMT 2020


On 9/16/20 5:32 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:38:42PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>> The description	in rs6000-builtin.def provides for a builtin named
>> __builtin_altivec_xst_len_r.  However, it is hand-defined in
>> altivec_init_builtins as __builtin_xst_len_r, against the usual naming
>> practice.  Fix that.
>>
>> Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu with no
>> regressions; committed as obvious.
> Does no one use this?  Should we provide an alias with the old (wrong)
> name?  What does the documentation say it should be?
>
> It is obvious of course, except for that "might break users' code"
> thing ;-)


Sorry, I should have mentioned this.  It's unlikely that people are 
using the incorrect name, as it is undocumented, and hidden by the 
supported overloaded interfaces.  The only documented interface is 
"vec_xl_len_r", which remains unchanged (and the internal hookup from 
that to this is unchanged by the patch).

If anyone's using the undocumented incorrect interface, I'd rather that 
get discovered and fixed.

Thanks,
Bill

>
> Segher


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list