[PING] [PATCH] PR c++/47346 - access control for nested type is ignored in template

[Jason Merrill]

On 08/31/2011 09:56 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> +         /* So if we are parsing a friend template declaration, then
> +            we should make sure that looking up the name of the
> +            declaration doesn't schedule it for type access checking
> +            at the time of instantiation of the current containing
> +            template class, if any.  */
> +         cp_no_type_access_check_p = is_friend;

Why does this need to be handled differently from non-template friends?

Perhaps the template type access checking code should be adjusted to use 
the existing deferred access checking code in semantics.c: 
push_deferring_access_checks and such.

Jason