std::copy() optimization, gcc vs clang
Wed Nov 20 11:58:00 GMT 2013
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 17:05 +0400, niXman wrote:
> I'm curious the thoughts of GCC developers about this topic:
> Clang in this case optimizing better than GCC.
> Is there any reason why GCC does not perform the same optimization?
Probably nobody has noticed or reported it yet.
Thanks for reporting this.
I've created a PR for this issue:
See the PR description for a reduced test case and some more detailed
More information about the Gcc-help