std::copy() optimization, gcc vs clang

Tue Nov 19 13:26:00 GMT 2013


I'm curious the thoughts of GCC developers about this topic:

Clang in this case optimizing better than GCC.
Is there any reason why GCC does not perform the same optimization?


Regards, niXman
Dual-target(32 & 64-bit) MinGW-W64 compilers for 32 and 64-bit Windows:
Another online IDE:

More information about the Gcc-help mailing list