Question about difference between integer literal handling in gcc 3.2.3 and 3.4.3

[Paul Tai]

This number: 3862586112 would result in 
'decimal constant is so large that it is unsigned' warning in both 3.2.3 and
3.4.3.

This number: 5055248896 would result in
3.4.3: 'integer constant is too large for "long" type' error.
3.2.3: neither warning nor error in 3.2.3.

My question is how does gcc 3.2.3 handle this second integer literal which
seems to be too big even for unsigned long.

Paul.