[gcc r16-7200] Fortran: Fix PR123868
Jerry DeLisle
jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Jan 30 21:58:59 GMT 2026
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca448bc5e435a2076cb3683a9be823c08a14e69e
commit r16-7200-gca448bc5e435a2076cb3683a9be823c08a14e69e
Author: Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Fri Jan 30 13:25:23 2026 -0800
Fortran: Fix PR123868
When copying derived types with allocatable array components where the
array element type also has allocatable components, the condition at
line 11071 was incorrectly triggering a call to gfc_duplicate_allocatable.
However, for allocatable arrays with nested allocatables (where
cmp_has_alloc_comps && c->as is true), the add_when_allocated code
already includes a gfc_duplicate_allocatable call (generated by the
recursive structure_alloc_comps call at lines 10290-10293).
This caused the outer array to be allocated twice: first by the explicit
gfc_duplicate_allocatable call at line 11099, and then again by the
gfc_duplicate_allocatable embedded in add_when_allocated. The first
allocation was leaked when the second allocation overwrote the data
pointer.
PR121628 added "add_when_allocated != NULL_TREE ||" to the condition,
which was redundant for scalars (already handled by !c->as) and wrong
for arrays (caused double allocation). Simply removing this clause
restores the correct pre-PR121628 behavior.
PR fortran/123868
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
* trans-array.cc (structure_alloc_comps): For COPY_ALLOC_COMP,
remove the add_when_allocated != NULL_TREE clause that PR121628
added. This clause was redundant for scalars and caused double
allocation for arrays with nested allocatable components.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_2.f90: Update expected memcpy count
from 4 to 3, as the double allocation bug is now fixed.
* gfortran.dg/pr123868.f90: New test.
Signed-off-by: Christopher Albert <albert@alumni.tugraz.at>
Diff:
---
gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc | 9 ++++++--
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_2.f90 | 5 ++--
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr123868.f90 | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc
index e207b0c06d35..ca2bff22ba31 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc
@@ -11063,9 +11063,14 @@ structure_alloc_comps (gfc_symbol * der_type, tree decl, tree dest,
copy_wrapper);
gfc_add_expr_to_block (&fnblock, call);
}
+ /* For allocatable arrays with nested allocatable components,
+ add_when_allocated already includes gfc_duplicate_allocatable
+ (from the recursive structure_alloc_comps call at line 10290-10293),
+ so we must not call it again here. PR121628 added an
+ add_when_allocated != NULL clause that was redundant for scalars
+ (already handled by !c->as) and wrong for arrays (double alloc). */
else if (c->attr.allocatable && !c->attr.proc_pointer
- && (add_when_allocated != NULL_TREE
- || !cmp_has_alloc_comps
+ && (!cmp_has_alloc_comps
|| !c->as
|| c->attr.codimension
|| caf_in_coarray (caf_mode)))
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_2.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_2.f90
index a95908c2928b..8fcac0e63f1e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_2.f90
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_2.f90
@@ -1,11 +1,12 @@
! This checks that the "z = y" assignment is not considered copyable, as the
! array is of a derived type containing allocatable components. Hence, we
-! we should expand the scalarized loop, which contains *two* memcpy calls
+! should expand the scalarized loop, which contains *two* memcpy calls
! for the assignment itself, plus one for initialization.
! { dg-do compile }
! { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-original" }
!
! PR 121628
+! PR 123868 - fixed double allocation that caused 4 memcpy instead of 3
!
type :: a
integer, allocatable :: i(:)
@@ -26,4 +27,4 @@
z = y
end
-! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "__builtin_memcpy" 4 "original" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "__builtin_memcpy" 3 "original" } }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr123868.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr123868.f90
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e21501ddaccf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr123868.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+! { dg-do run }
+! PR fortran/123868 - Memory leak on assignment with nested allocatable
+! components. Regression introduced by PR121628 commit which caused
+! gfc_duplicate_allocatable to be called twice for allocatable array
+! components with nested allocatable components.
+
+module bugMod
+
+ type :: vs
+ character(len=1), allocatable :: s
+ end type vs
+
+ type :: ih
+ type(vs), allocatable, dimension(:) :: hk
+ end type ih
+
+end module bugMod
+
+program bugProg
+ use bugMod
+
+ block
+ type(ih) :: c, d
+
+ allocate(d%hk(1))
+ allocate(d%hk(1)%s)
+ d%hk(1)%s='z'
+ c=d
+ if (c%hk(1)%s /= 'z') stop 1
+ if (d%hk(1)%s /= 'z') stop 2
+
+ end block
+
+end program bugProg
More information about the Gcc-cvs
mailing list