[gcc r16-6733] xfail store_merging_19.c for the same reason as store_merging_18.c
Andrew Pinski
pinskia@gcc.gnu.org
Tue Jan 13 05:10:55 GMT 2026
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f8a2eb766f92036296b2b753d558e903e0bd44b1
commit r16-6733-gf8a2eb766f92036296b2b753d558e903e0bd44b1
Author: Andrew Pinski <andrew.pinski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon Jan 12 21:06:49 2026 -0800
xfail store_merging_19.c for the same reason as store_merging_18.c
store_merging_19.c is almost the same as store_merging_18.c except
it has assume align in it to allow it work on strict align targets.
Somehow when I was looking at the testresults I noticed 18 but not 19
when I was looking into failures.
Pushed as obvious.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/store_merging_19.c: xfail.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <andrew.pinski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Diff:
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/store_merging_19.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/store_merging_19.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/store_merging_19.c
index 0a2bbc4bfdeb..c4e4a94e35b3 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/store_merging_19.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/store_merging_19.c
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
/* PR tree-optimization/83843 */
/* { dg-do run } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-tree-vectorize -fdump-tree-store-merging" } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Merging successful" 3 "store-merging" { target store_merge } } } */
+/* xfailed after PR 122845, see PR 123541 ( */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Merging successful" 3 "store-merging" { target store_merge xfail *-*-* } } } */
__attribute__((noipa)) void
foo (unsigned char *buf, unsigned char *tab)
More information about the Gcc-cvs
mailing list