[gcc r16-6491] Regenerate gcc/configure with the correct version of autoconf

[Andrew Pinski]

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ae06660928877fde3f4fd3e78c257eadc53bd994

commit r16-6491-gae06660928877fde3f4fd3e78c257eadc53bd994
Author: Andrew Pinski <andrew.pinski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date:   Sun Jan 4 11:12:52 2026 -0800

    Regenerate gcc/configure with the correct version of autoconf
    
    This regenerates configure with the unmodified version of autoconf
    instead of a distro one.
    
    Pushed as obvious.
    
    gcc/ChangeLog:
    
            * configure: Regenerate.
    
    Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <andrew.pinski@oss.qualcomm.com>

Diff:
---
 gcc/configure | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/configure b/gcc/configure
index c975d59a7b20..fd9e3c88363f 100755
--- a/gcc/configure
+++ b/gcc/configure
@@ -6294,7 +6294,7 @@ else
     We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807,
     since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers
     incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807.  */
-#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31))
+#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62))
   int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721
 		       && LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1)
 		      ? 1 : -1];
@@ -6340,7 +6340,7 @@ else
     We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807,
     since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers
     incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807.  */
-#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31))
+#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62))
   int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721
 		       && LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1)
 		      ? 1 : -1];
@@ -6364,7 +6364,7 @@ rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext
     We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807,
     since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers
     incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807.  */
-#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31))
+#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62))
   int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721
 		       && LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1)
 		      ? 1 : -1];
@@ -6409,7 +6409,7 @@ else
     We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807,
     since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers
     incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807.  */
-#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31))
+#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62))
   int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721
 		       && LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1)
 		      ? 1 : -1];
@@ -6433,7 +6433,7 @@ rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext
     We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807,
     since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers
     incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807.  */
-#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31))
+#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62))
   int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721
 		       && LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1)
 		      ? 1 : -1];