[gcc r11-7725] [PR99422] LRA: Use lookup_constraint only for a single constraint in process_address_1.
Vladimir Makarov
vmakarov@gcc.gnu.org
Thu Mar 18 19:59:30 GMT 2021
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a4670f58ebff805e35268542aac35f9791980954
commit r11-7725-ga4670f58ebff805e35268542aac35f9791980954
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Mar 18 15:58:26 2021 -0400
[PR99422] LRA: Use lookup_constraint only for a single constraint in process_address_1.
This is an additional patch for PR99422. In process_address_1 we
look only at the first constraint in the 1st alternative
and ignore all other possibilities. As we don't know what
alternative and constraint will be used at this stage, we can be sure
only for a single constraint with one alternative and should use unknown
constraint for all other cases.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR target/99422
* lra-constraints.c (process_address_1): Use lookup_constraint
only for a single constraint.
Diff:
---
gcc/lra-constraints.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/lra-constraints.c b/gcc/lra-constraints.c
index 9205826960c..64801b6fcce 100644
--- a/gcc/lra-constraints.c
+++ b/gcc/lra-constraints.c
@@ -3459,7 +3459,12 @@ process_address_1 (int nop, bool check_only_p,
constraint
= skip_contraint_modifiers (curr_static_id->operand[dup].constraint);
}
- cn = lookup_constraint (*constraint == '\0' ? "X" : constraint);
+ if (*skip_contraint_modifiers (constraint
+ + CONSTRAINT_LEN (constraint[0],
+ constraint)) != '\0')
+ cn = CONSTRAINT__UNKNOWN;
+ else
+ cn = lookup_constraint (*constraint == '\0' ? "X" : constraint);
if (insn_extra_address_constraint (cn)
/* When we find an asm operand with an address constraint that
doesn't satisfy address_operand to begin with, we clear
More information about the Gcc-cvs
mailing list