[Bug fortran/95690] [11 Regression] ICE in set_mem_attributes_minus_bitpos, at emit-rtl.c:2092
cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Tue Jun 23 13:31:01 GMT 2020
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95690
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
<rguenth@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d919c33fbd29a996326840dae3b5e093c3190f4
commit r10-8355-g7d919c33fbd29a996326840dae3b5e093c3190f4
Author: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Date: Thu Jun 4 13:44:58 2020 +0200
middle-end/95493 - bogus MEM_ATTRS for variable array access
The following patch avoids keeping the inherited MEM_ATTRS when
set_mem_attributes_minus_bitpos is called with a variable ARRAY_REF.
The inherited ones may not reflect the correct offset and neither
does the updated alias-set match the inherited MEM_EXPR. This all
ends up confusing path-based alias-analysis, causing wrong-code.
The fix is to stop not adopting a MEM_EXPR for certain kinds of
expressions and instead handle everything we can. There's still
the constant kind trees case which I'm too lazy to look into right
now. I did refrain from adding SSA_NAME there and instead avoided
calling set_mem_attributes_minus_bitpos when debug expression
expansion ended up expanding a SSA definition RHS which should
already have taken care of setting the appropriate MEM_ATTRS.
It also avoids calling set_mem_attributes on the
DECL_INITIAL of a CONST_DECL which seems pointless since there
cannot be a sensible MEM_EXPR derived from that. We're overwriting
both other possibly useful info, alias-set and alignment immediately
so the following patch simply removes the call instead of making
the function deal with even more (unexpected) trees that are not
memory accesses.
2020-06-23 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR middle-end/95493
PR middle-end/95690
* cfgexpand.c (expand_debug_expr): Avoid calling
set_mem_attributes_minus_bitpos when we were expanding
an SSA name.
* emit-rtl.c (set_mem_attributes_minus_bitpos): Remove
ARRAY_REF special-casing, add CONSTRUCTOR to the set of
special-cases we do not want MEM_EXPRs for. Assert
we end up with reasonable MEM_EXPRs.
* varasm.c (build_constant_desc): Remove set_mem_attributes call.
* g++.dg/torture/pr95493.C: New testcase.
* g++.dg/torture/pr95493-1.C: Likewise.
* gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90: Likewise.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list