[Bug tree-optimization/84419] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017/CPU2006 521/621, 527/627, 554/654, 445, 454, 481, 416 runfails after r256628 with march=skylake-avx512
alexander.nesterovskiy at intel dot com
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Mon Feb 19 15:55:00 GMT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Bug tree-optimization/84419] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017/CPU2006 521/621, 527/627, 554/654, 445, 454, 481, 416 runfails after r256628 with march=skylake-avx512
- Next message (by thread): [Bug tree-optimization/84419] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017/CPU2006 521/621, 527/627, 554/654, 445, 454, 481, 416 runfails after r256628 with march=skylake-avx512
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84419
--- Comment #5 from Alexander Nesterovskiy <alexander.nesterovskiy at intel dot com> ---
Yes, looks like the problem is with unaligned access (there is no fail in
reproducer when starting a loop with i=0).
It seems that your patch works - there are no runfails for reproducer, 445,
521, 527, 554 (tested on SPEC train workload).
I'll report upon finishing other benchmarks.
- Previous message (by thread): [Bug tree-optimization/84419] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017/CPU2006 521/621, 527/627, 554/654, 445, 454, 481, 416 runfails after r256628 with march=skylake-avx512
- Next message (by thread): [Bug tree-optimization/84419] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017/CPU2006 521/621, 527/627, 554/654, 445, 454, 481, 416 runfails after r256628 with march=skylake-avx512
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list