[Bug tree-optimization/84419] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017/CPU2006 521/621, 527/627, 554/654, 445, 454, 481, 416 runfails after r256628 with march=skylake-avx512
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Mon Feb 19 12:11:00 GMT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Bug tree-optimization/84419] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017/CPU2006 521/621, 527/627, 554/654, 445, 454, 481, 416 runfails after r256628 with march=skylake-avx512
- Next message (by thread): [Bug tree-optimization/84419] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017/CPU2006 521/621, 527/627, 554/654, 445, 454, 481, 416 runfails after r256628 with march=skylake-avx512
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84419
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 43456
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43456&action=edit
Possible patch
I think the problem was that the optimisation was dropping
the alignment information, so we ended up using an aligned
rather than an unaligned access.
I don't have access to skylake hardware, but could you
try the attached patch?
- Previous message (by thread): [Bug tree-optimization/84419] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017/CPU2006 521/621, 527/627, 554/654, 445, 454, 481, 416 runfails after r256628 with march=skylake-avx512
- Next message (by thread): [Bug tree-optimization/84419] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017/CPU2006 521/621, 527/627, 554/654, 445, 454, 481, 416 runfails after r256628 with march=skylake-avx512
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list