[Bug target/78255] [5/6/7 regression] Indirect sibling call causing wrong code generation for ARM

rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Thu Dec 1 14:46:00 GMT 2016


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78255

--- Comment #8 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hmm, why is this even being considered on ARM?

arm.h:#define NO_FUNCTION_CSE 1

doc/tm.texi
@defmac NO_FUNCTION_CSE
Define this macro to be true if it is as good or better to call a constant
function address than to call an address kept in a register.
@end defmac


More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list