[Bug middle-end/73550] Another wrong -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning in switch statement

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73550

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |missed-optimization

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to amker from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > There was a patch to improve jump threading and vrp here just within a few
> > weeks. I wonder why that did not help. Basically this is a missing jump
> > threading.
> 
> It can't help if the uninitialized info is analyzed/given before jump
> threading/vrp?

We don't do maybe unitialized until very late in the optimization passes.