[Bug middle-end/73550] Another wrong -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning in switch statement

[amker at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73550

--- Comment #2 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> There was a patch to improve jump threading and vrp here just within a few
> weeks. I wonder why that did not help. Basically this is a missing jump
> threading.

It can't help if the uninitialized info is analyzed/given before jump
threading/vrp?