[Bug ipa/60761] [4.9 Regression] Names of all function clones in g++ are "<built-in>", in both warnings and dumps

[glisse at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60761

--- Comment #14 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #13)
> It is not clear to me why you want to print <clone> at all. It is an
> internal detail.

Imagine a function void f(unsigned a, unsigned b) where gcc makes a clone
specializing a=0. If the function contains a comparison a<=b, you might get a
warning because the comparison is always true. As a user, I would be quite
confused...

Ok, this particular example won't happen, but I think it is still a reason why
writing <clone> and maybe some more details can be useful.