[Bug ipa/60761] [4.9 Regression] Names of all function clones in g++ are "<built-in>", in both warnings and dumps

[jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60761

--- Comment #15 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> Also, perhaps to make the change conservative enough for 4.9, might be best
> to not append anything now, and only look at DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN (recurse
> on it) if !DECL_LANG_SPECIFIC.  More verbose printing can be perhaps
> deferred for stage1.

I agree, mostly because...

(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #13)
> It is not clear to me why you want to print <clone> at all. It is an
> internal detail.

...just printing "<clone>" really provides fairly little value.  If we
(hopefully from the next version on) manage to print details about
properties of the particular clone, it will become useful.