[Bug sanitizer/55309] gcc's address-sanitizer 66% slower than clang's

[kcc at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309

--- Comment #45 from Kostya Serebryany <kcc at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-22 08:36:14 UTC ---
> I'm wondering if the failure goes away compiled with -O0 instead ?
No, the failure is still present with -O0