[Bug sanitizer/55309] gcc's address-sanitizer 66% slower than clang's

[Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309

Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |Joost.VandeVondele at mat
                   |                            |dot ethz.ch

--- Comment #44 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> 2013-02-22 08:31:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #43)
> 400.perlbench fails with a global-buffer-overflow which clang does not detect.

I'm wondering if the failure goes away compiled with -O0 instead ?