[Bug c++/42983] [C++0x] Defaulted virtual destructor isn't virtual

[jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com]

------- Comment #16 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com  2010-02-08 15:10 -------
(In reply to comment #15)
> Destroying an object from a base class pointer whose destructor is not virtual
> is an undefined behaviour according to the standard. I tend to think that
> silently removing the virutal property when considering the default
> declaration, introduces a serious bug in the code.

Yes, but you're using an experimental implementation of an incomplete
specification.  Using it for serious code would be foolish, so I tend to agree
it's low priority




-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42983