[Bug c++/42983] [C++0x] Defaulted virtual destructor isn't virtual

[lavock at gmail dot com]

------- Comment #17 from lavock at gmail dot com  2010-02-08 15:18 -------
(In reply to comment #16)
> Yes, but you're using an experimental implementation of an incomplete
> specification.  Using it for serious code would be foolish, so I tend to agree
> it's low priority

Yes, i agree with low priority, but maybe don't mark available for this
feature, since it seems to be partially available.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42983