[Bug fortran/40551] Wrong code due to missing copy-in/copy-out stried array to assumed-size dummy

[burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #12 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-07-07 12:47 -------
> You were right - contiguous does need initializing.  Not for this case but
> some of the other uses that I referred to.

Paul, what is the plan? You had a 4.4 and 4.5 check in, contiguous is not
initialized in 4.5. Do you want to fix that? Or can this PR be closed?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40551