[Bug fortran/40551] Wrong code due to missing copy-in/copy-out stried array to assumed-size dummy

[burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #13 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-07-07 15:27 -------
(In reply to comment #12)
> > You were right - contiguous does need initializing.  Not for this case but
> > some of the other uses that I referred to.
> Paul, what is the plan? You had a 4.4 and 4.5 check in, contiguous is not
> initialized in 4.5. Do you want to fix that?

I somehow missed that it was checked in as part of PR 40646,
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&revision=149262.

Thus: I think this PR be closed, can it?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40551