[Bug tree-optimization/18892] missed optimization with & and ==

[amacleod at redhat dot com]

------- Additional Comments From amacleod at redhat dot com  2004-12-09 14:34 -------
Im confused.  I see a final form of:

f (a)
{
<bb 0>:
  return (a & -129) == 144;
}


when I compile this program with mainline.  Isnt this what you claimed it should
be compiled to?  or are you claiming it should be optimized to 'return 0'?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18892