[Bug tree-optimization/18892] missed optimization with & and ==

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-08 20:31 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Subject: Re:  New: missed SRA of a block copy
> 
> Hmm?  What does SRA have to do with anything here?

Nothing I had messed up on the summary and already changed
it after seeing that I had messed up on it.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18892