g++.dg/other/static11.C regression

[Jan Hubicka]

> On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:48:03PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > I think Jan's solution is the right one.  The assembler will object to
> > fake internal register names/numbers, so we don't lose the ability to
> > detect this bug.
> 
> I'm not sure that's correct.  I think that in the case of
> 
> 	mov AP, %eax
> 
> that it'll just be interpreted as a symbol.

We would get linker error later.  I don't remember seeing this
particular abort ever since I added it orignally, so I guess it is not
too critical place to have sanity check on.

Honza
> 
> 
> r~