g++.dg/other/static11.C regression

Richard Henderson rth@twiddle.net
Sun Oct 19 20:15:00 GMT 2003


On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:48:03PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> I think Jan's solution is the right one.  The assembler will object to
> fake internal register names/numbers, so we don't lose the ability to
> detect this bug.

I'm not sure that's correct.  I think that in the case of

	mov AP, %eax

that it'll just be interpreted as a symbol.


r~



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list