web/830: gnatsweb creates PRs with bogus version information

[Joseph Myers]

>Number:         830
>Category:       web
>Synopsis:       gnatsweb creates PRs with bogus version information
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    gerald
>State:          open
>Class:          accepts-illegal
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Fri Nov 17 03:46:00 PST 2000
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Joseph S. Myers
>Release:        2.97 20001116 (experimental)
>Organization:
none
>Environment:
System: Linux decomino 2.2.17 #1 Mon Sep 4 20:22:16 UTC 2000 i686 unknown
Architecture: i686

	
host: i686-pc-linux-gnu
build: i686-pc-linux-gnu
target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
configured with: ../gcc-cvs/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc/snapshot --disable-shared --enable-threads=posix --with-system-zlib
>Description:

Some PRs appear to be entering GNATS with the GCC version
"unknown-1.0" listed - this seems to be the gnatsweb default version.
This version information is useless; gnatsweb should refuse to accept
PRs without a proper version.

>How-To-Repeat:

Observe PRs arriving on gcc-bugs with "unknown-1.0" as the only
indication of the version affected.

>Fix:

gnatsweb should insist that a proper version be given if "unknown-1.0"
is the version in a submitted PR.

(Ideally, it would also, if the version specified predates 2.95, tell
the user to test with a more current GCC first, but this probably
requires too much intelligence.)

(Also, gnats.html should recommend gccbug as preferred for submitting
bugs against snapshots/3.0, since gccbug now automatically includes
the full version, host/build/target and configure options.  Similarly,
bugs.html should make it clear that it is preferred for bug reports to
go via GNATS rather than direct to gcc-bugs and that they're less
likely to be forgotten about if they go to GNATS.)
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: