egcs-1.0.2: string<unsigned char> failure
Gerald Pfeifer
pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at
Sun May 3 13:17:00 GMT 1998
On Sun, 3 May 1998, Munagala V. S. Ramanath wrote:
> Stability is important for what I'm doing and I'm not sure how stable
> the snapshots are, so I've been staying with releases. Also, on my Sparc
> 2 a distribution takes 6.5 hours to build and about 100MB of disk space;
Well, sometimes snapshots are more stable, sometimes less. These days,
various CVS snapshots that I tried appeared rather stable, so the next
snapshot might be worth a try for you.
>> You might want to consider having a look at some current snapshot!
> If the egcs group would prefer _not_ to receive bug reports against
> any earlier version once a snapshot has been released, I'd suggest
> adding a note to this effect on the egcs web page and I will be
> glad to comply.
No, no! Your reports are certainly highly appreciated (especially as
they are well documented and easily reproducible).
I'm sorry for the misunderstanding I may have caused. I just had the
feeling that there is some project where you exercise features which do
not work in the latest release but have been fixed in the development
sources and that these "old" bugs are seriously hampering your regular
work.
My remark was only intended as a hint that it _might_ be worth a try
forgoing the stability of a release for those improvements that have
been made to the source base in the meantime.
Again, sorry for any misunderstanding I may have caused.
Gerald
--
Gerald Pfeifer (Jerry) Vienna University of Technology
pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list