Q For Language Lawyers
jimmie.davis@l-3com.com
jimmie.davis@l-3com.com
Mon Feb 7 15:21:00 GMT 2011
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
That wording was identical in Fortran 66. Nothing was stated explicitly
in Fortran I, as far as I can see. It was also forbidden in IBM Fortran
IV.
So it has been illegal for over 40 years, at least :-)
It's fairly easily fixable by using a simple preprocessor - e.g. a
Python
script.
Regards,
Nick Maclaren.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
It was easy to fix, along with a couple of other unique extensions (like
INTERNAL FUNCTIONS). What I find amazing is the subtle differences
between the compilers (and coding styles); almost every time I handle a
'dusty deck' I learn something new.
Once again, gfortran team...excellent product. About 100K SLOC, took a
little over a day to get it all compiled.
--bud
More information about the Fortran
mailing list