ABSTRACT interfaces + PROCEDURE declarations

[Tobias Schlüter]

Tobias SchlÃŒter wrote:
> Tobias Burnus wrote:
>> From my side Janus' patch (with my test case and Janus' bind(C) check
>> replaced by mine) is OK.
>>
>> Janus: Can you write the ChangeLog, merge the patches* and send an email
>> with your abstract interface patch to both fortran@ and to gcc-patches@?
>> (* feel free to modify my test case or patch)
>>
>> I think it can then be checked in.
> 
> I take it that Tobias has reviewed the technical aspects, but I'd still 
> like to see testcases together with the patch.  Also, there are still a 
> number of formatting issues.  In gfc_match_procedure() the indenting is 
> consistently non-gnuish.  There's also some #if 0'd code and a TODO that 
> makes me wonder if either that code should be merged with 
> match_attr_spec() or the common functionality be extracted from both. 
> The hunk to resolve_symbol() lacks vertical whitespace.

Sorry, I was confusing the different patches.  Yes, the abstract 
interface patch looks ok.  Except for the missing testcases and 
ChangeLogs :)

Cheers,
- Tobi