ENTRY bug

[Andrew Pinski]

On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 21:56 -0700, Tim Prince wrote:
> I hope not.  Code which uses ENTRY and compiles with g77 isn't likely to 
> be f90.  Much code which used ENTRY dated from before ENTRY came in f77, 
> and used special features, partially supported by various extinct 
> compilers, so there is no way all of it can be made to work reliably 
> without reconciling it to standard.

First I read the summary wrong when I replied. And this is optional
arguments in a different way than the f90 optional arguments.  This is
about optional by having less arguments than the main entry point.  PR
25818 is about that case and not the f90 optional arguments.

-- Pinski