PRs 28971 and 28993

[Steve Kargl]

On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 06:31:15AM +0200, Paul Thomas wrote:
> I propose to clear the two above PRs tomorrow morning, unless anybody 
> objects; both are marked as "severe" but both test cases work with the 
> most recent gfortran.  I have to confess that one (28971) was a 
> regression in that it is OK with GCC 4.0.3 20051106, did not work with 
> 4.2.0 in July but is OK now.  Neither Steve nor I can see what fixed it 
> and I do not have the time or the inclination to find out by reverting 
> my tree to that time.  Maybe we should put the testscase in the 
> testsuite to guard against a further regression?  The other is filed 
> against gcc-4.0.3 but does compile fine 4.0.3, dated as above, and any 
> subsequent version.
> 
> Thank you both for the PRs.  It would be very helpful if you would both 
> update to the latest gfortran and would continue to post such problems 
> as you find to Bugzilla.
> 

I think clearing the PRs is fine.  I recall marking both 
with WAITING for feadback.  On report indicates the 
individual is upgrading while the other is in limbo.

-- 
Steve