[Patch, fortran] PR29422 and PR29428 - allocatable component wrinkles

[Richard E Maine]

On Oct 11, 2006, at 3:23 PM, Richard E Maine wrote:
> On Oct 11, 2006, at 3:10 PM, Brooks Moses wrote:
>> Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
>>>> Dominique, would you be so kind as to submit a PR for this, please?
>>> This is pr29434.
>>
>> Given Richard's comments confirming that gfortran's behavior is  
>> correct, should I close this PR?  (If so, is the correct  
>> resolution "INVALID"?)
>
> Since I've been known to screw up before :-( it might be wise to  
> wait to see whether Andy replies to "defend" the g95 behavior. He's  
> no dummy and has caught me making errors before.

I don't think I am violating propriety by revealing that Andy sent me  
a 2-word private reply to my query on comp.lang.fortran as to whether  
he was listening and whether he agreed. The two words were both "yes".

While that, of course, isn't absolute proof, it helps give me  
confidence that I didn't overlook some subtle (or not so subtle)  
point that Andy had noticed.

-- 
Richard Maine                |  Good judgment comes from experience;
Richard.Maine@nasa.gov       |  experience comes from bad judgment.
                             |        -- Mark Twain