Vs: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR20880 - Failure to detect procedures encompassing own interface
erik.edelmann@pp.inet.fi
erik.edelmann@pp.inet.fi
Wed Nov 22 13:40:00 GMT 2006
>----Alkuperäinen viesti----
>Lähettäjä: paulthomas2@wanadoo.fr
>Päivämäärä: Nov 22, 2006 10:21:00 AM
>Vastaanottaja: erik.edelmann@iki.fi
>Kopio: Fortran List <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.
org>
>Aihe: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR20880 - Failure to detect procedures
encompassing own interface
>
>erik,
>> I hate being the bringer of bad news, but this patch doesn't reg.test
>> cleanly for me on trunk (r119061) on Gentoo Linux/x86; I get
>>
>That's alright - we have the patches reviewed for a reason :-)
>
>
>> gfortran.dg/assumed_charlen_function_1.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
>> gfortran.dg/func_derived_3.f90 -O2 (internal compiler error)
>>
>are still fine for me on a tree that was updated last night. I would be
>grateful if you would let me have either the appropriate section of the
>regtest log and/or a gdb session for these two testcases. The patch is
>sufficiently innocuous that I am astonished that there is an
>installation difference.
Here's relevant parts of the log from r119088 on RedHat/x86. Note that the
errors are slightly different from the errors I got on Gentoo -- here gfortran.
dg/func_derived_3.f90 fails only for -O3. I'll look into it more closely
tomorrow (I will not have time tonight, sorry).
Erik
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: gfortran.log
Type: text/x-log
Size: 11201 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/attachments/20061122/6afe9dd1/attachment.bin>
More information about the Fortran
mailing list