Backlog of patches to 4.1

[Steve Kargl]

On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 08:06:36AM +0100, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> 
> I just started to check on how many patches that I have not committed
> to 4.1 (shame!); I got to 23 and ran out of time for this morning.  I
> would guess that there are a couple more that I did not get to.
> 
> What is the general feeling?  Backport in batches, do the whole lot at
> once or neither of these?
> 

I have no objections to a backport if someone does it.  Personally,
I'll apply patches to trunk and 4.2 for as long as reasonable, and
4.1 only if a minimum of effort is required.

-- 
Steve