Forall_3.f90 failure question

[Jerry DeLisle]

Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 08:55:16PM -0700, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> 
>>Is everyone else seeing the forall_3.f90 failure at -O1?
>>
>>I thought this was fixed but I may have misunderstood some of the 
>>previous list mail.  I wanted to make sure it is not unique to my 
>>hardware.  It acts like a memory allocation problem at runtime.
>>
> 
> 
> Jakub just submitted a revised patch and Paul B. has
> review and ok'd said patch.  I'm not sure if Jakub 
> has committed it yet.
> 
It appears to be committed to 4.0 and not 4.1