Forall_3.f90 failure question

[Steve Kargl]

On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 08:55:16PM -0700, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> Is everyone else seeing the forall_3.f90 failure at -O1?
> 
> I thought this was fixed but I may have misunderstood some of the 
> previous list mail.  I wanted to make sure it is not unique to my 
> hardware.  It acts like a memory allocation problem at runtime.
> 

Jakub just submitted a revised patch and Paul B. has
review and ok'd said patch.  I'm not sure if Jakub 
has committed it yet.

-- 
Steve