Adjustable array segfaults WORKAROUIND

[Jerry DeLisle]

On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 22:27, Scott Brown wrote:
> When I use assumed size arrays instead of adjustable size, it works, no 
> idea why!  So if I use:
>     real:: x(:,:)
> Instead of
>     real:: x(n,n)
> 
> It runs fine.
> 
> Scott.
> 
> 
Scott,

Do you want to post the bug?

Also I notice that the inner loop gets values assigned far exceeding the
value of n.  I put a print statement just after the x(i,j) assignment
and the value of j is at 918 before the segfault with n = 3.

I have been stripping out my code here and the problem went away and I
don't know what I did yet.

Jerry

Jerry