Enquiry
Steve Kargl
sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
Fri Apr 23 13:03:00 GMT 2004
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 04:53:30PM -0400, Scott Robert Ladd wrote:
> Paul Brook wrote:
> >You may be able to pull something from
> >http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/todo.html
> >and/or http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/librarystatus.html
> >I guess you could also look at bugzilla for things that are broken, and
> >the testsuite for things that work.
>
> For some time now, I've been running the testsuite nightly, and get the
> following results (from last night's report):
>
> === gfortran Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes 2571
> # of unexpected failures 50
> # of untested testcases 7
For FreeBSD we have,
=== gfortran Summary ===
# of expected passes 2589
# of unexpected failures 39
The failures are isolated to 5 testcase: actual.f90, contained_2.f90, forall_3.f90,
function_module_1.f90, and specifics.f90.
> I'm looking through the testsuite to get an idea of what's being tested
> and what isn't. I've already searched for a free-as-in-beer Fortran 95
> compliance test suite, and haven't found one. However, I have some
> ideas... :)
I don't know of a free f95 test suite. There is the NIST f77 testsuite
is has been quite useful, but obviously doesn't cover f95. We can also
use UCBTEST to test some of the math intrinsics. A commercial test suite
is available from www.fortran.com.
--
Steve
More information about the Fortran
mailing list