This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: divmod transform: add test-cases


On Thu, 11 Aug 2016, Jeff Law wrote:

> On 08/09/2016 04:58 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > ping https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg01869.html
> This seems to be dependent upon other patches, this is not OK until all
> prereqs are resolved.
> 
> You're using SI/DI in the descriptions, but then using more traditional C
> types like int, unsigned, long long in the actual test.
> 
> If you intent is really to nail down SI/DI mode testing, then the way to go
> will be to define typedefs that correspond directly to SI and DI modes:
> 
> typedef unsigned int u32 __attribute__((mode(SI)));
> typedef signed int s32 __attribute__((mode(SI)));
> 
> You can do something similar for DImode.
> 
> It may not matter because of your effective-target {divmod,divmod_simode}
> selectors, but it still seems cleaner.
> 
> With that change, this is OK when its prereqs are resolved.

Note that for the main patch I don't like the current state of the
divmod libcall issue.  I think we need to solve this in a more
reasonable manner and not expose this oddness to a GIMPLE level pass.

Any ideas welcome - I don't have a very good one :/

The best idea I have is to not lie about libfunc availability in
the optab handler.

Richard.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]