This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On 2013-11-02 19:02, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Can you expand? I think it's just as much inline as the other overload -- does it need to be different?The other overload is constexpr thus it's implicitly inline. The fall back is very simple too and I think it should be declared inline, unless you analyzed the assembly and believe it normally boils down to more than, say, 5 instructions. Paolo
I see. It didn't occur to me to declare it inline, as I only ever use the keyword to satisfy
ODR requirements. E.g. the non-member swap isn't declared inline either. For future reference, is there a rule of thumb in use?
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |